Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a score of 90.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A71's overall score of 87.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than Samsung Galaxy A71, it must be told that it is also just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71. They have a same size screen, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and the same screen pixels density.
Galaxy Note 20 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a back camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution, a bigger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and higher video frame rates.
The Galaxy A71 features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a bit superior battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A71, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A71. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A71, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.