Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 80.4. Even though Galaxy A71 is a little bit heavier than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it's a bit thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a CPU that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A71's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density. The Galaxy A71 has a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy A71 features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a way more megapixels camera and a way larger camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality.
Galaxy A71 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.