Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A71's 87.5 overall score. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it is also a little thicker and a bit heavier. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71. They have a higher pixel quantity per screen inch, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a screen of the same size. Galaxy A71 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a larger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite's battery performance is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A71 one.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.