Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is much better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a score of 87.5 against 77.6. Galaxy A71's design is noticeably lighter and way thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before. These phones have Android OS, but Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A71 has a much faster CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have 8 CPU cores and 6 GB of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much more mega pixels camera in the back. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A71, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.