Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 87.5 against 80.1. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy A71 design is notably thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were released with only a few months difference.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel quantity per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality, a camera with a lot better 64 megapixels resolution and a much higher (4K) video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Galaxy A71 count with extremely similar battery durations.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A71 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.