Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, getting a general score of 87.5 against 85.6. Samsung Galaxy A71's design is a bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it is a little bit thicker and was released a little bit over a year before. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy A71 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has a way better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.