Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A71's general score of 87.5. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should provide the user all the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3's design is newer and thinner than the Galaxy A71's, although it is a lot heavier.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a screen that is just as good as the display in Galaxy A71, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a just a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 resolution and a little bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A71 features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A71, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way better resolution back camera and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos.
Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.