Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 411.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.21 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is a bit better than the ZTE Axon 10 Pro's global score of 80.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version while ZTE Axon 10 Pro has Android 10, providing the user some extra features and improved performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 and ZTE Axon 10 Pro were released with only 9 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A71 body is a little bit heavier but also a little bit thinner than ZTE Axon 10 Pro.
ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the ZTE Axon 10 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. ZTE Axon 10 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The ZTE Axon 10 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A71, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A71 has just a bit better battery performance than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy A71 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than ZTE Axon 10 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing photos in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a lot more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.