Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than the Galaxy A73 5G, with an 87.1 score against 80.5. LG Velvet is a a little lighter but just a little bit thicker phone than the Galaxy A73 5G. LG Velvet counts with a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A73 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A73 5G has a bit sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a bit smaller display, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit worse pixels density. The LG Velvet has a greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A73 5G has greater battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a way less mega pixels resolution camera in the back, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.