Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A73 5G, having an 83.8 score against 80.5. Samsung Galaxy A50's body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A73 5G, but it is just a bit lighter. Galaxy A50 counts with a way better performance than Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy A73 5G has a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit bigger display. Galaxy A73 5G captures a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A73 5G has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.