Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, getting a 98.9 score against 80.5. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12, so it gives some additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better display than Galaxy A73 5G, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per display inch, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A73 5G. Both of them have a F1.8 aperture and a camera with a 108 megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A73 5G features a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A73 5G counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.