Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an overall score of 98, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G's 80.5 global score. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a heavier and somewhat thicker device than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a more recent 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A73 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a greater pixel amount in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy A73 5G has just a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A73 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A73 5G's battery performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. They have the same camera aperture and the same resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.