Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-10-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is way better than the Galaxy A8 (2016), getting a global score of 93.2 against 72.8. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max design is a lot newer, but notably heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy A8 (2016). The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A8 (2016) counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a bigger screen, a higher 1284 x 2778 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features better battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a 32 percent more battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light situations and a lot better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.