Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is much better than the Galaxy A8 (2016), with a overall score of 81.9 against 72.8. Google Pixel 4's construction is extremely newer and lighter, but also somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A8 (2016). Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Google Pixel 4 also has a little bit better display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280px.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 4 shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a way less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light captures.
The Galaxy A8 (2016) counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy A8 (2016) features better battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 18% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.