Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is much better than Galaxy A8 (2016), having an 89 score against 72.8. Although Google Pixel 5 is just a little bit thicker than Galaxy A8 (2016), it's somewhat lighter and also noticeably newer. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Google Pixel 5 counts with a better camera than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a lot worse 12.2 MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Google Pixel 5 has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.