Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-10-01 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a general score of 77, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A8 (2016)'s 72.8 score. LG G7 Fit is a a lot newer and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Galaxy A8 (2016), although it is a little thicker. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG G7 Fit has newer 8.1 Oreo version while Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Galaxy A8 (2016) has just a little better performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores. The LG G7 Fit counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a lot better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a better pixels quantity in each inch of screen and a bit larger screen.
The LG G7 Fit has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the LG G7 Fit also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016) features a little longer battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG G7 Fit takes just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.