Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), getting an 81.3 score against 72.8. LG V35 ThinQ is a newer and lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), but it's also just a little thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit bigger screen and a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low light environments.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. LG V35 ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016)'s battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.