Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than Galaxy A8 (2016), having a overall score of 87.1 against 72.8. These phones have Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version and Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone than the Galaxy A8 (2016), but it is a little heavier and thicker.
The Galaxy A8 (2016) has a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a little better pixels amount in each display inch, a bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better camera than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality, a larger aperture and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a 36 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.