Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is way better than Galaxy A8 (2016)'s 72.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is noticeably newer than Galaxy A8 (2016)'s, although it's thicker and incredibly heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a larger display, a much better 1440 x 3088px resolution and a higher display density.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a way higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.