Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 386 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A8 (2016)'s general score of 72.8. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version, providing the user lots of additional features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a noticeably newer phone than Galaxy A8 (2016), although it is a lot thicker and incredibly heavier.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better looking display than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels density. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 1 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy A8 (2016) takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A8 (2016) also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.