Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.17 x 3.02 x 0.28 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gold and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Galaxy A8 (2016), getting a general score of 92.3 against 72.8. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy A8 (2016) has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A8 (2016), but they have the same thickness.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A8 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has 5 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A8 (2016), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a little higher pixels quantity in each screen inch and a larger display.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's battery performance is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A8 (2016).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.