Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-01-06 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), with a score of 93.3 against 79.2. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro design is newer and a little thinner, but heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018). The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and 2 GB more RAM.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a quite greater screen density, a quite bigger display and a quite better 1170 x 2532 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) features a bit bigger memory to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 256 GB.
IPhone 13 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a way less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a bigger camera aperture. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 3095mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.