Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-01-06 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is just a bit better than the Galaxy A8 (2018), having a score of 80 against 79.2. The Google Pixel 3 body is newer, lighter and a little thinner than Galaxy A8 (2018). The Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018). Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Google Pixel 3 and Galaxy A8 (2018) count with very similar screens, although the Google Pixel 3 has a just a bit inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen, a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2160 resolution. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera and a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A8 (2018) also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.