Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a global score of 85.4, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 overall score. LG K92 is a somewhat heavier phone than the Galaxy A8 (2018), but both are 0.33inches thick. LG K92's processor is very similar to the Galaxy A8 (2018) one, and although the LG K92 has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with just a bit better looking display than LG K92, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher display pixels density. The LG K92 has a lot better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a camera with a much better resolution and a way higher video quality.
The LG K92 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG K92 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.