Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2018-01-06 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a global score of 81.3, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 general score. LG V35 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), even when they were released with only 5 months difference. LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px, a quite bigger display and a little more pixels per display inch.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 3300mAh battery size. LG V35 ThinQ captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.