Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it is also a little heavier. Galaxy A8 (2018) features a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a way higher 50 megapixels resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.