Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy A8 (2018), with a general score of 87.1 against 79.2. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is much newer than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it's heavier and just a little bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a much better performing processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a larger camera aperture, a way higher (4K) video definition and a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a really longer battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 50 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.