Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), with an 86.2 score against 79.2. Although the Motorola Moto G200 5G is noticeably newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has a bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per display inch. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much longer battery life than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.