Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is a bit better than the Galaxy A8 (2018), having a general score of 87 against 79.2. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is incredibly newer and a little thinner than the Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, but it is heavier. The Motorola razr (2020) features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a little bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density and a bit higher 1080 x 2220px resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Motorola razr (2020) features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A8 (2018) has a little longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.