Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-01-06 | -- |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 (2018) is slightly better than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, having a 79.2 score against 77. The Galaxy A8 (2018) design is a little thicker but just a little lighter than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger display. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A8 (2018) counts with a much longer battery performance than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot better resolution back camera and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.