Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2018-01-06 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018)'s general score of 79.2. Samsung Galaxy A52 is a a little bit heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), but both of them are 0.33inches thick. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A8 (2018) has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher display density. Galaxy A52 shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.