Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-01-06 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), with a general score of 88.1 against 79.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy F62 is noticeably newer than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), it is way heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with more RAM memory.
Galaxy F62 counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Galaxy F62 features a greater camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy F62 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy F62 has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.