Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a general score of 83.3 against 74.9. The iPhone 11 is a incredibly newer and a little bit lighter phone than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it's thicker. Apple iPhone 11 counts with a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has 2 less CPU cores , it also counts with more RAM and a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 11 has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little lower pixels number per inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 828 x 1792px, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Galaxy A9 (2016) has a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than iPhone 11, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 128 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features improved battery performance than iPhone 11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3110mAh. The Apple iPhone 11 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a lesser mega-pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.