Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), with a overall score of 85.3 against 74.9. IPhone 11 Pro Max is a way newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is somewhat heavier and just a little thicker. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1242 x 2688 resolution.
IPhone 11 Pro Max features a quite better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and 1 GB more RAM memory. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with lesser mega pixels and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) has just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 128 GB. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a battery performance that is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A9 (2016), although the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a 1% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.