Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is way better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), with a general score of 92.8 against 74.9. The iPhone 12 Pro body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is a little bit lighter. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a higher resolution of 1170 x 2532, a bit bigger screen and a bit higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and more RAM. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower video resolution and a camera with less MP, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light environments. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.