Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 is way better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a general score of 91.5 against 74.9. Apple iPhone 13 is a much newer and somewhat lighter phone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), but it is also a bit thicker. The Apple iPhone 13 counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has less processing cores (although faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bit processor.
The iPhone 13 counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a better resolution of 1170 x 2532px, a bit greater pixels density and a little bit bigger display. IPhone 13 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a camera with a worse 12 megapixels resolution and a lower video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Apple iPhone 13 features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features improved battery performance than iPhone 13, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.