Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), getting a 93.3 score against 74.9. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro design is extremely newer than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it's a little bit heavier and just a little thicker. IPhone 13 Pro features a very superior processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has less processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor and 3 GB more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a bit greater pixel count per inch in the screen, a better 1170 x 2532 resolution and a quite bigger screen. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
IPhone 13 Pro captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower resolution camera in the back and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) features greater battery life than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 29 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.