Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a global score of 93.2, which is much better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 general score. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016). IPhone 13 Pro Max has a lot better performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has less processing cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a much better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little better display pixel density and a better resolution of 1284 x 2778. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a lot bigger camera aperture.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4352mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.