Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | -- |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 14 Pro is way better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), with a overall score of 95.6 against 74.9. Apple iPhone 14 Pro's construction is extremely newer than the Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it's a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. IPhone 14 Pro has a way better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit larger display, a higher resolution of 1179 x 2556px and a higher pixels number per screen inch.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro features a way better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a greater amount of RAM memory. IPhone 14 Pro shoots better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the iPhone 14 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way more mega pixels camera.
The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A9 (2016) features better battery duration than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.