Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 16.x |
| 2016-01-01 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | -- |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max is way better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with a 94.9 score against 74.9. The iPhone 14 Pro Max body is extremely newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Galaxy A9 (2016). IPhone 14 Pro Max has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a higher pixels density, a better 1290 x 2796 resolution and a quite larger screen.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much greater processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same video definition, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, faster video frame rate and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and video. The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.