Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than Galaxy A9 (2016), with an 81.9 score against 74.9. Even though the Google Pixel 4 is just a bit thicker than Galaxy A9 (2016), it's somewhat lighter and much newer. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2280px resolution and a little greater pixel density. The Google Pixel 4 takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower 12.2 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
The Galaxy A9 (2016) features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 128 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2016) features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.