Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Clearly white and Just black |
| Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a global score of 87.5, which is much better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 score. The Google Pixel 4a 5G body is extremely newer and lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, although it's also a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite higher pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations. Galaxy A9 (2016) features a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.