Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Metal | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is much better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), with an 89 score against 74.9. Google Pixel 5 is a noticeably newer and way lighter phone than the Galaxy A9 (2016), although it is just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 5 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little higher pixel density.
Google Pixel 5 features a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 5 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4080mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh. The Google Pixel 5 features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a camera with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.