Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro has an overall score of 77, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 overall score. Honor 50 Pro's construction is incredibly newer and just a bit lighter, but also a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a better resolution of 1236 x 2676 pixels, a little higher screen pixel density and a little larger screen.
Honor 50 Pro features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Honor 50 Pro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM.
Honor 50 Pro and Galaxy A9 (2016) have quite similar battery durations. The Honor 50 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.9 aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a camera with a much higher 108 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.