Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| 2016-01-01 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s score of 74.9. HTC U11's design is newer and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it's a little thicker. HTC U11 features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC U11 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The HTC U11 has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The HTC U11 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a less mega pixels camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low-light situations.
The HTC U11 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits up to 128 GB, the HTC U11 also has 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with greater battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.