Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-01-01 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G7 Fit has a score of 77, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s general score of 74.9. The LG G7 Fit is a incredibly newer and way lighter device than Galaxy A9 (2016), although it's also just a bit thicker. The LG G7 Fit and Galaxy A9 (2016) feature quite similar CPUs, because although the LG G7 Fit has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a larger amount of RAM.
The LG G7 Fit features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a quite bigger screen and a much higher screen pixels density. LG G7 Fit has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the LG G7 Fit also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G7 Fit takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a back facing camera with more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) counts with greater battery life than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.