Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-01-01 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is better than the Galaxy A9 (2016), having a overall score of 82.7 against 74.9. The LG G8X ThinQ design is notably newer and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A9 (2016)'s, but it's somewhat thicker. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better display than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little greater pixel density. LG G8X ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), because although it has a worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.