Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2016-01-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Black and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016)'s 74.9 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ is a notably lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), but both are equally thin. LG V35 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 32 GB more internal storage. LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a bigger aperture for better low light images and videos and a back facing camera with more MP. The Galaxy A9 (2016) has longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.