Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), with a 91.2 score against 74.9. LG Wing's design is a lot newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016). LG Wing counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little higher amount of pixels in each inch of display, a bit larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The LG Wing has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Wing shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and better video frame rates.
The LG Wing has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG Wing and Galaxy A9 (2016) have quite similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.