Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-01-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.29 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Champagne gold, Midnight black, Pearl white and Pink | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), with a general score of 89.6 against 74.9. The Motorola edge is a much newer and a little bit lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), although it's also incredibly thicker. Motorola edge features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola edge also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola edge has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a little bit higher screen density, a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Motorola edge features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola edge also has a larger aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Motorola edge counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola edge has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2016), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.